DirecTV, Inc. v. Ostrowski
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT DALE OSTROW-SKI’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS III AND V OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
FILIP, District Judge.
Plaintiff alleges that Defendants purchased and used a device to decrypt or unscramble Plaintiffs “DIRECTV” satellite programming and that Defendants then displayed this programming without authorization. The complaint includes five counts. Count I seeks relief under 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C) for unauthorized interception and exhibition of copyrighted materials. Count II is brought under 18 U.S.C. § 2520 for interception,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Mark A. Lee v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. LynchDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Sheridan v. iheartMedia, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- DirecTV, Inc. v. SchulienDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005