Legal Opinion

DirecTV, Inc. v. Ostrowski

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 12, 2004No. 03 C 8618PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT DALE OSTROW-SKI’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS III AND V OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

FILIP, District Judge.

Plaintiff alleges that Defendants purchased and used a device to decrypt or unscramble Plaintiffs “DIRECTV” satellite programming and that Defendants then displayed this programming without authorization. The complaint includes five counts. Count I seeks relief under 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C) for unauthorized interception and exhibition of copyrighted materials. Count II is brought under 18 U.S.C. § 2520 for interception,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Mark A. Lee v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. LynchDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  2. Sheridan v. iheartMedia, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. DirecTV, Inc. v. SchulienDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API