Legal Opinion

People v. Hamilton

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1995No. E015214PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

Defendant and appellant Alonzo Hamilton appeals from his conviction of two counts of carjacking in violation of Penal Code section 215. His appeal presents the simple question of whether or not he was validly convicted of two offenses based on his taking of a vehicle at gunpoint from a husband and wife, one the driver and one the passenger. We hold that he was, and further find that the evidence was sufficient to support the judgment. Accordingly, we affirm.

Statement of Facts

Due to the nature of defendant’s contentions, we need not consider his defense of mistaken…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. California v. RamosSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. CovarrubiasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. OrtegaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. DeFranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API