Legal Opinion
Flach v. Integrity Trust Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 13, 1938No. Appeal, 155PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, J.,
This is an action in assumpsit on an oral contract. The jury found for plaintiff. Defendant’s motions for new trial and for judgment n. o. v. were dismissed. From the judgment entered on the verdict defendant has appealed.
Several reasons are assigned why plaintiff should not recover. Consideration of one will suffice, as it alone requires reversal of the judgment for plaintiff and the entry of judgment n. o. v. for defendant.
Plaintiff pleaded an oral contract entered into between plaintiff and defendant on or abqut the 28th day of September, 1926, whereby plaintiff agreed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lewey v. H. C. Fricke Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Deemer v. Weaver, Exrx.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Smith v. BlachleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Schwab v. CornellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Hall v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Robert P. BIGGANS, Appellant, v. BACHE HALSEY STUART SHIELDS, INC., F/T/A Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- A.J. Cunningham Packing Corp. v. Congress Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Culbreth v. SimoneDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- A.J. Cunningham Packing Corp. And Chicago Dressed Beef Co., Inc. And Continental Food Products, Inc. And Florence Beef Company v. Congress Financial Corporation and Philadelphia National Bank. Pierce Trading Company v. Congress Financial Corporation and Philadelphia National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Robert P. BIGGANS, Appellant, v. BACHE HALSEY STUART SHIELDS, INC., F/T/A Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981