Legal Opinion

Schwab v. Cornell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 1932No. Appeal, 20PublishedCited by 38 opinions

There was no evidence of snch continued fraud or concealment as would toll the l-unning of the statute: Smith v. Blachley, 198 Pa. 173.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

Plaintiff employed defendant, a conveyancer, to act in his behalf in the consummation of the purchase of two building lots. The duty of defendant was to prepare the deed for the properties, to see that plaintiff obtained a clear title, and to procure a policy of title insurance guaranteeing good title, clear of encumbrances, or inform plaintiff of any exceptions. When the settlement sheet of the title company was delivered to defendant, it showed unpaid taxes of twenty cents on each lot for the year 1922 and required the production of certain tax receipts. In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lewey v. H. C. Fricke Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Noonan v. PardeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Nesbitt v. Erie Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Walters v. DitzlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Deemer v. Weaver, Exrx.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Lutherland, Inc. v. DahlenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Acker v. PalenaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API