Legal Opinion
In re Haydu
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 14, 1952No. 49665PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYERS, District Judge.
These are cross-motions, one for an order dismissing the petition for review arid affirming the Referee’s report, and the other for an order reversing the latter, which recommended that the bankrupt’s discharge be denied. The specifications are three in number, and there are three subdivisions of the second. The Referee has sustained specification 1, dismissed 2(a) and (b), sustained 2(c) and dismissed specification 3.
The objecting creditor does not challenge the action of the Referee in dismissing as stated, and the question for decision then is whether specification 1,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crue v. TimmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Kitzinger v. Geo. V. Clark Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- In re RoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re CoxDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1965
- Max Grossman v. U. S. Slicing MacHine Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Grossman v. U. S. Slicing Machine Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- Max Grossman v. U. S. Slicing MacHine Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Max Grossman v. U. S. Slicing MacHine Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966