Legal Opinion · Dissent

Max Grossman v. U. S. Slicing MacHine Company, Inc

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 14, 1966No. 15726Published

1DissentGaney, Circuit Judge

I dissent.

The question of admissibility of the document in question concerns itself solely with page 1. Page 2 thereof is an admitted authentic statement of the facts therein stated, since the plaintiff states that the signature at the bottom thereof is his, and there is no objection to its admissibility, which leads to the question here posed, as to whether page 1 was admissible likewise, which contained on it the initials of plaintiff.

I am agreed that there is a dearth of authority as to whether or not multiple page statements, such as obtain here, signed on the last page thereof, make the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Geelen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. French v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  3. Beardsley v. WeaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Motor Valve & Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  5. In re HayduDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API