Legal Opinion

Hostetler v. Eddy

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 12, 1905PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Blade Haivlc District Court. — Hon. E. C. Platt, Judge. Action at law to recover damages for failure to couvey real estate pursuant to a contract alleged. The facts are stated in the opinion. There was a jury trial, and verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

The defendant now owns, and for more than thirty years has owned, contiguous lots 2 and 3 in block *4022 in the city of Waterloo. In July, 1891, defendant leased, by writing, for a stipulated rental, the northwest sixty-five feet of the northeast ninety feet of said lots to plaintiff, “ to be used for the purpose of erecting a store building, . . for the period of'six years . . . ending on the 8th day of July, 1903.” Among the further provisions of the lease appear the following:

It is also agreed by the parties hereto that said Hostetler shall have the option to purchase of said Eddy the property…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Charless v. LambersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
  2. Morris v. SargentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  3. Barnett v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  4. Rhodes, Pegram & Co. v. McCormickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
  5. Thomas v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1878

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gustafson v. FoglemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. Merchants Mutual Bonding Co. v. UnderbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  3. Fardal v. SatreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Commercial Savings Bank v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API