Legal Opinion
NNDJ, INC. v. Comerica Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 21, 2008No. Civil 07-14406PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING COMERICA INCORPORATED’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JOHN FEIKENS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs filed this class action lawsuit against various regional and national banks (the “Banks”) alleging that the Banks violated sections of the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) by issuing official checks 1 and charging non-aceount- holders a fee to cash them. Defendant Comerica Incorporated (“Comerica”) has filed a motion for summary judgment. As the basis for its motion, it argues that issuing a teller’s check and charging a non-accountholder customer a fee to cash it does not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States Department of Treasury v. FabeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Murphy v. National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Juliet Murphy v. National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Wollschlager v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020