Legal Opinion

Malone & Hyde of Tupelo, Inc. v. Kent

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1964No. 43211PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

In this workmen’s compensation case, Ruble Kent, appellee, received an injury to bis back while working at bis job for Malone & Hyde of Tupelo, Inc., appellant. The question is the extent of Kent’s permanent partial disability, which determines the amount of bis workmen’s *881compensation benefits. The commission found that he sustained a loss of wage-earning capacity of eighteen dollars per week, or approximately twenty-seven and one-half percent. This order was approved by the Circuit Court of Lee County, and we think it was amply supported by the evidence.

Kent was thirty-four years of age,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southeastern Construction Co. v. Dependent of DodsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Modern Laundry, Inc. v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  3. I. Taitel & Son v. TwinerMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Lucedale Veneer Co. v. KeelMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Hale v. General Box Manufacturing Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McGowan v. Orleans Furniture, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  2. UNIVERSITY OF MISS. MEDICAL CENTER v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2005
  3. Walker Mfg. Co. v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1998
  4. Cook v. President CasinoCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1999
  5. Harris v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API