Malone & Hyde of Tupelo, Inc. v. Kent
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.
In this workmen’s compensation case, Ruble Kent, appellee, received an injury to bis back while working at bis job for Malone & Hyde of Tupelo, Inc., appellant. The question is the extent of Kent’s permanent partial disability, which determines the amount of bis workmen’s *881compensation benefits. The commission found that he sustained a loss of wage-earning capacity of eighteen dollars per week, or approximately twenty-seven and one-half percent. This order was approved by the Circuit Court of Lee County, and we think it was amply supported by the evidence.
Kent was thirty-four years of age,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Southeastern Construction Co. v. Dependent of DodsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Modern Laundry, Inc. v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
- I. Taitel & Son v. TwinerMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Lucedale Veneer Co. v. KeelMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
- Hale v. General Box Manufacturing Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1959
3Cited by9 opinions
- McGowan v. Orleans Furniture, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- UNIVERSITY OF MISS. MEDICAL CENTER v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2005
- Walker Mfg. Co. v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1998
- Cook v. President CasinoCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1999
- Harris v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.