Legal Opinion

Southeastern Construction Co. v. Dependent of Dodson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1963No. 42670PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

This case involves the extent of an administrative agency’s discretion in determining the apportionment of compensation death benefits, between that due to the injury and that due to a preexisting symptomatic coronary artery disease; the constitutional validity of the statute; and the proper formula for apportionment. The claim for workmen’s compensation was filed by appellee, the widow of S. W. Dodson. Dodson worked for Southeastern Construction Company, appellant, at the time of his death.

The statute involved is the second paragraph of section 4 of the Mississippi Workmbh’s "Compensation…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Tanenbaum v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Walters v. BlackledgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Frankfort General Ins. Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. South Cent. Bell Telephone Co. v. AdenMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  2. General Elec. Co. v. McKinnonMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Delta Drilling Co. v. CannetteMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Bill Williams Feed Service v. MangumMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Cockrell Banana Company v. HarrisMississippi Supreme Court · 1968

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API