Legal Opinion

Pickens v. Dorris

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 1885PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from tlie St. Louis Circuit Court, Daniel Dillon, Judge. The interest of Thomas Dorris in the net income from rents and profits, being an equitable right conferred upon him by a volunteer and not out of his own property or by trusts of his own creation, are not subject to the payment of his debts, until they become Ms by reduction to possession so as to be Ms property. Mcllvaine v. Smith, 42 Mo. 45; Hardenbtcrgh v. Blair, 30 N. J. Eq. 645; Pom. Eq.

Read the full summary

Appeal from tlie St. Louis Circuit Court, Daniel Dillon, Judge. The interest of Thomas Dorris in the net income from rents and profits, being an equitable right conferred upon him by a volunteer and not out of his own property or by trusts of his own creation, are not subject to the payment of his debts, until they become Ms by reduction to possession so as to be Ms property. Mcllvaine v. Smith, 42 Mo. 45; Hardenbtcrgh v. Blair, 30 N. J. Eq. 645; Pom. Eq. Jur., §§ 102-106; Nichols v. Eaton, 91 U. S. 716 (bk. 23, L. ed. 254), and cases cited; Hyde v. Woods, 94 U. S. 523 (bk. 24, Id. 265);…

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, J.

George P. Dorris made his will, in which, among other things, he devised certain houses to trustees “in trust to possess and keep the same rented as advantageously as ■may be, and out of the rents to pay for all proper repairs to said houses and for a reasonable insurance thereon and the exjienses of their care, and all taxes, charges, and assessments, levied, imposed, or charged thereon and within the times required by law, and the balance to my •son, Thomas Dorris, during his natural life.”

The remainder of his estate he devised to the same trustees to be held, sold, and put into condition…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nichols v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Broadway National Bank v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  3. Pendleton v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  4. Campbell v. . FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  5. Lackland v. GarescheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sherman v. HavensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Arlington State Bank v. PaulsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Nunn v. Titche-Goettinger Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. Heaton v. DicksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Paddock-Hawley Iron Co. v. McDonaldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API