Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Havens

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1915No. 19,737PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from Leavenworth district court; James H. Wendorff, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The plaintiff is a judgment creditor of the defendant, Arthur B. Havens. The executors of the will of Paul E. Havens, brother of the defendant, are garnishees in a proceeding to reach, and apply in payment of plaintiff’s judgment, the income of a trust estate bequeathed by the will to the defendant.

*656Two questions are involved: First, does the will properly construed disclose an intention on the part of the testator to create a “spendthrift trust” in favor of his brother; in other words, to secure to his brother the life enjoyment of the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Nichols v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Broadway National Bank v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  3. Sears v. ChoateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Jourolmon v. MassengillTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Smith v. TowersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wright v. JenksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  2. Watts v. McKaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  3. In Re RothUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  4. Nunn v. Titche-Goettinger Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  5. Pond v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API