Legal Opinion

Lynch v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 21, 1909No. Gen. No. 14,731PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action in case for personal injuries. Error to Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Max Eberhardt, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1908.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Chytraus

delivered the opinion of the court.

The attorneys for plaintiff insist that in an action of tort against two defendants sued jointly there may properly be separate trials and judgments as to the two defendants and that verdicts and judgments in favor of the plaintiff may even be for different amounts as to the two defendants. The attorneys for the City contend that a judgment rendered in such action against one defendant operates as a discontinuance of the suit as against the other defendant.

Where several persons jointly commit a tort the person injured has his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. LansdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. FoulksIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Albright v. McTigheU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1892
  4. Yeazel v. AlexanderIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Davis v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1866

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Handley v. Unarco Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Jenkins v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  3. Rathbone v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Chrudinsky v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Fanning v. BrandlAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API