Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rathbone v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1915No. Docket No. 31PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Wayne; Codd, J. Case by William Rathbone against the Detroit United Railway and another for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1DissentBird, J.

While plaintiff was a passenger on one of defendant’s interurban cars operating *588between Detroit and Port- Huron, it collided with a good roads construction train, at a highway crossing near Marysville, and in consequence thereof he was seriously injured. When the collision occurred, the car was behind its schedule time, and was going at a high rate of speed. After discovering the good roads construction train at the crossing, little or no effort was made by the motorman to stop the car or to slacken its speed. The trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. Defendant railway, which alone…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. HuntleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Michigan, Central Railroad v. ColemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Robinson v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Jones v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Everroad v. GabbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Neal v. Curtis & Co. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Pure Gas & Chemical Company v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Weddle v. LogesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Association Research and Development Corporation v. CNA Financial Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Detroit City Gas Co. v. SymeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API