Legal Opinion

In re 1-800 Contacts Antitrust Litig.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided April 5, 2017No. MDL No. 2770Published

1Opinion of the Court

SARAH S. VANCE, Chair

Before the Panel:* Plaintiffs in the District of District of Columbia Bartolucci action, which since has been transferred to the District of Utah, move to centralize six actions in the District of District of Columbia. The actions, which are listed on the attached Schedule A, are pending in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (two actions) and the District of Utah (four actions). The Panel has been informed of an additional federal action involving related issues in the Eastern District of Arkansas.

All responding plaintiffs support centralization in the District of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Gerber Probiotic Products Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
  2. In re 3M Co. Lava Ultimate Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API