Legal Opinion
In re 3M Co. Lava Ultimate Products Liability Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided August 5, 2016No. MDL No. 2727PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING TRANSFER
Sarah S. Vance, Chair
Before the Panel: Plaintiffs in an action pending in the District of Minnesota (Bhatia) move under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize their action and an action pending in the Southern District of Florida (Fernandez) in the District of Minnesota. The actions are listed on the attached Schedule A. The Panel has been informed of four additional related federal actions, all of which are pending in the District of Minnesota.
Plaintiff in one of the three Minnesota tag-along actions (Lernbo) supports centralization in the District of Minnesota. Both the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Eli Lilly & Co.(cephalexin Monohydrate)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
- In Re Transocean Ltd. Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
- In re Gerber Probiotic Products Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
- In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Hudson's Bay Co. Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2018
- In re Athena Universal Life II Cost of Insurance Increase LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2017
- In re 1-800 Contacts Antitrust Litig.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2017
- In re Customized Promotional Prods. Antitrust Litig.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2018
- In re Dometic Corp. Gas Absorption Refrigerator Prods. Liab. Litig.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.