Legal Opinion

Bogue Supply Co. v. Davis

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

Respondent alleges that it is a corporation, domiciled in and doing a general mill and mining supply business from Salt Lake City, Utah; that in 1917 it sold and delivered certain mining and milling machinery to the defendants William F. Davis and G. R. Nickey, who were co-partners doing a mining and milling business at Shoup, Lemhi county, Idaho, under the firm name and style of Nickey & Davis. The prayer demands judgment against *253said defendants William F. Davis and G. R. Nickey and said partnership, jointly and severally.

Defendants were residents of Bntte, Montana, but were at the time…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Weeter Lumber Co. v. FalesIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Coffin v. EdgingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Diamond Bank v. Van MeterIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  4. McMunn v. LehrkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Glenn v. Aultman & Taylor Machinery Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ZitoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. Lundin v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Sherwood & Roberts, Inc. v. RiplingerIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Sherwood & Roberts, Inc. v. RiplingerIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API