Legal Opinion

Bonitz Bros. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1984No. Appeal, No. 3195 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Barbieri,

Bonitz Brothers, Inc., Petitioner, comes before us in this workmen’s compensation case with the sole contention that the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) erred in affirming an award by a referee of travel expenses incurred by Irene Wymes (Claimant), in connection with out-of-state medical care. We will affirm.3

Claimant has been under continuous medical care since she sustained a work-related injury on March 8, 1980 and the insurance carrier has been paying medical expenses throughout that period. Having failed to obtain relief, after a discussion with her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of New Castle v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Toland v. Murphy Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Goliat v. Butler Consolidated Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Griffiths v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Helen Mining Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Roadway Express, Inc. v. Workmens Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Harbison-Walker Refractories & Commercial Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Appeal of MurraySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API