Legal Opinion

BALL v. KIRBY

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 2021No. 3:21-cv-00333Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAWN BALL, #20190001029, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:21-cv-00333 v. (SAPORITO, M.J.) STATE TROOPER-OFFICER MARK A. KIRBY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM The plaintiff in this case, Dawn Marie Ball, was previously granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this action. It has come to our attention that the incarcerated plaintiff is subject to the “three strikes rule” set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). For the reasons stated herein, upon sua sponte reconsideration of our prior order granting leave to proceed IFP, we will revoke the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coleman v. TollefsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Dawn Ball v. FamiglioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  3. Debro S. Abdul-Akbar v. Roderick R. MckelvieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  4. Henry Gibbs, Jr. v. Officer Paul Cross, Maintenance SupervisorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  5. Brown v. LyonsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API