Legal Opinion
In Re Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 24, 2002No. C-02-1550 VRWPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WALKER, District Judge.
The People of the State of California, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and the City and County of San Francisco (collectively, objectors) move to dismiss for lack of appellate jurisdiction the appeal of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG & E) and its parent company, PG & E Corporation, from the bankruptcy court’s order entered on March 18, 2002. Doc # 45. PG & E also moves, in the alternative, for leave to file an interlocutory appeal of that order pursuant to 28 USC § 158(a)(3).
I
On Apiri 6, 2001, PG & E filed a voluntary petition under chapter…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Texaco, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellant v. William R. Ponsoldt, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Professor Harriet Spiegel v. The Trustees of Tufts CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Colonial Bank v. Freeman (In Re Pacific Forest Products Corp.)District Court, S.D. Florida · 2005
- Fluor Enterprises, Inc. v. Orion Refining Corp. (In Re Orion Refining Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2006
- In re Crystal RoneyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2026
- Lee v. FieldDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2019