Legal Opinion
Leander Development Corp. v. Taft-Buick Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 7, 1930No. 380PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
Both plaintiffs and defendant appeal. Plaintiffs appeal from -that part of the decree holding patent No. 1,275,654, granted August 13, 1918, for temperature indicating means for motorcars, invalid, and defendant appeals from that part holding patent No. 1.206.783, granted November 28, 1916,. for temperature indicating system and apparatus for internal combustion engines, valid and infringed.
The patents were issued to Boyce, who assigned them to the Leander Development Corporation, and the Motometer Company, Inc., is the exclusive licensee. Patent No. 1,275,654 was a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- McCarty v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Ansonia Brass & Copper Co. v. Electrical Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Dwight & Lloyd Sintering Co. v. GreenawaltCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- H. K. Regar & Sons, Inc. v. Scott & Williams, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. Cullen-Thompson Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939