Legal Opinion

United States v. Norman Harold Haiges, III

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 28, 1982No. 82-1124PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUG, Circuit Judge:

Norman Harold Haiges, III claims that the Government’s failure to bring him to trial within seventy days of the date of his indictment violated the Speedy Trial Act (the “Act”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3174. The district court denied Haiges’s pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment, concluding that the Government had complied with the time limitations imposed by the Act. We affirm.

Haiges was arrested on November 6, 1981, shortly after a robbery of the Valley National Bank in Scottsdale, Arizona. He made an initial appearance before a magistrate on the day of his arrest, and was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Harry H. Nance, United States of America v. Leon Stelly, United States of America v. Taybren LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. Mildred CarrasquilloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Michael ArkusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. MalaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Herman Mers, Lester Mers, Randy James Myers, Paul J. FerranteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. John Charles Richard MentzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Hernando YunisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. Eddie Ray RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API