Legal Opinion
Lund v. Olson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 12, 1931No. 28,441PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The appeal is by plaintiff from the judgments herein in favor of defendants Einar A. Lund and Emmett Olson.
The action arose out of an automobile collision wherein plaintiff; the nine-year old.daughter of defendant Lund, was severely injured. Large verdicts were rendered against Fox, who drove defendant Olson’s car, and against Ehlers, the servant and driver of defendant Lund’s car, in which the little girl was riding when injured. The appeals of Fox and Ehlers were disposed of in Lund v. Olson, 182 Minn. 204, 234 N. W. 310, where the facts are more fully set out.
As to defendant Lund the court…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Taubert v. TaubertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Ploetz v. HoltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Mulvehill v. BatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Provo v. ConradSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Behrens v. Hawkeye Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Meyn v. Dulaney-Miller Auto Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
- Parks v. ParksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Miller v. MonsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Luster v. LusterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.