Legal Opinion
MacIas v. Excel Building Services LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 7, 2011No. C 10-04152 SIPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING EXCEL’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
Excel’s motion to compel arbitration is currently scheduled for hearing on February 11, 2011. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule T—1(b), the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and hereby VACATES the hearing. Having considered the papers submitted, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby DENIES Excel’s motion. The Case Management Conference set for February 11, 2011 at 2:30 p.m. remains on calendar.
BACKGROUND
Susana Macias (“Macias”) began working for Excel Building Services…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Ridgeway v. Nabors Completion & Production Services Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Carroll v. Belmont Park Entertainment LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Chien v. Bumble Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Collins v. BMW of North America, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.