Ingersoll v. Seatoft
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Outaga-mie county: Jora GoodlaND, Circuit Judge. In December, 1897, there was pending in the circuit court for Winnebago county an action in which G. D. Ingersoll was plaintiff and the Ingersoll Land & Lumber Company was defendant.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Outaga-mie county: Jora GoodlaND, Circuit Judge. In December, 1897, there was pending in the circuit court for Winnebago county an action in which G. D. Ingersoll was plaintiff and the Ingersoll Land & Lumber Company was defendant. The defendant desired to appeal to this court, and gave ah undertaking signed by the defendants in this action to pay the costs on that appeal and any final judgment 'obtained therein, not exceeding $1,000. Judgment was finally entered in said action in favor of plaintiff, and this action is brought on that…
1Opinion of the CourtBardeeN, J.
The appellant seeks to attack the eighth and tenth findings of fact. Both of these findings contain several propositions of fact which are either undisputed or are clearly supported by the evidence. The exceptions, being general, are not sufficient to raise any question except whether the findings support the judgment. Warner v. Cuckow, 90 Wis. 291; Bailey v. Costello, 94 Wis. 87. What has been said is based upon the supposition that the tenth finding was in fact excepted to. The record shows two exceptions to the ninth finding and none to the tenth. It is argued that this was a clear…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bailey v. CostelloWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Reinke v. WrightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Warner v. CuckowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hart v. HartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- T. D. Kellogg Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Webster Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909