Williams v. Muthersbaugh
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Osborne District Court. The nature of this action, and the facts, appear in the opinion. At the December Term, 1882, the district court affirmed certain rulings in regard to an attachment made by a justice of the peace in an action wherein Muthersbaugh was plaintiff and Williams and another were defendants, which rulings defendant Williams brings here for review.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This action was originally brought before a justice of the peace of Osborne county, by S. Muthersbaugh against George W. Williams and W. J. Carr, copartners doing business under the firm-name of Williams & Carr, to recover the sum of $30.55. A trial was had before the justice, and the plaintiff recovered the sum of $21.55 debt, and $10.50 costs. This judgment, except as to a small proportion of the costs, probably about one or two dollars, accruing in certain attachment proceedings had in the case, is admitted to be correct; but the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alvey v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Hershfield v. Horace B. Claflin & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Sears v. Gearn & HoughtonNew York Supreme Court · 1852
- Board Com'rs Jefferson Co. v. SwainSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Leach v. CookSupreme Court of Vermont · 1838
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Evans v. VirginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Bank of Topeka v. EatonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1899
- Crane v. Ring & SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Worthley v. GoodbarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890