Legal Opinion

Crane v. Ring & Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Franklin District Court. Action by Ring & Smith against Crane on an account for goods sold. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs, at the January term, 1889. The defendant brings error. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

*59The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

Action brought by Ring & Smith against Erank E. Crane on an account for goods sold and delivered to him, at his request, amounting to $1,282.57, with. 7 per cent, per annum on the sum of $1,185.37 from the 30th of December, 1886, and, on $97.20, interest from October 7, 1887. Crane answered, admitting the correctness of the items making up the $97.20 which accrued in 1887, and alleged a tender of "that amount before the action was commenced, and offered to bring it into court and pay plaintiff. He denied, however, “all and singular, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Alvey v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Williams v. MuthersbaughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Collier v. MongerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Lawson v. Lawrence Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API