Legal Opinion

Scott v. Walden

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1942No. 2426—7924PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKMAN, Commissioner.

This suit, filed by J. D. Scott and wife, Prince E. Scott, against Miss Nettie B. Walden, is in the nature of an action to quiet title, having for its purpose the cancellation of a right of way easement granted by plaintiffs to the defendant in a deed. The question for decision is not whether an easement was created, but whether the plaintiffs are entitled to a cancellation of the easement on account of the ripening of a condition subsequent expressed in the grant. The. language of the grant will be set out in full below. A jury was demanded, but at the conclusion of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murphy v. DilworthTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Trust Co., Indp. Exctr. v. BauereisenTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Ryan v. KentTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  4. First Nat. Bank of Amarillo v. RushTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  5. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. BaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Coffee v. William Marsh Rice UniversityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  2. Indiana Broadcasting Corp. v. Star Stations of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Maxwell v. Lake, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  4. Don Drum Real Estate Company v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. King v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API