Legal Opinion

Hochschild, Kohn & Co. v. Murdoch

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 3, 1928No. [No. 14, January Term, 1928.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

The owner and occupier of a department store in Baltimore City appeals in this case from a judgment for damages for injuries to a customer knocked down by one of the wings of a revolving door. The only exceptions pressed are to the trial court’s refusal of instructions to the jury that their verdict should be for the defendant because of a lack of any legally sufficient evidence of negligence causing the injury, because of a variance between the allegations of negligent cause and the facts adduced as proof of it, and because of contributory negligence on the plaintiff’s part.

The plaintiff, a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Charles C. Fulton Building Co. v. StichelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
  2. Texas Co. v. Washington, Baltimore & Annapolis Electric RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Consolidated Gas Co. v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  4. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Variety Iron & Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  5. Agricultural & Mechanical Ass'n v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rawls v. Hochschild, Kohn & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  2. Dickey v. Hochschild, Kohn & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  3. Virginia Dare Stores, Inc. v. SchumanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  4. Eyerly v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  5. Smith v. BranscomeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API