Hochschild, Kohn & Co. v. Murdoch
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.
The owner and occupier of a department store in Baltimore City appeals in this case from a judgment for damages for injuries to a customer knocked down by one of the wings of a revolving door. The only exceptions pressed are to the trial court’s refusal of instructions to the jury that their verdict should be for the defendant because of a lack of any legally sufficient evidence of negligence causing the injury, because of a variance between the allegations of negligent cause and the facts adduced as proof of it, and because of contributory negligence on the plaintiff’s part.
The plaintiff, a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Charles C. Fulton Building Co. v. StichelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
- Texas Co. v. Washington, Baltimore & Annapolis Electric RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Consolidated Gas Co. v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Variety Iron & Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
- Agricultural & Mechanical Ass'n v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rawls v. Hochschild, Kohn & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
- Dickey v. Hochschild, Kohn & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
- Virginia Dare Stores, Inc. v. SchumanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Eyerly v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
- Smith v. BranscomeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.