Legal Opinion
August Technology Corp. v. Camtek, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 22, 2011No. 2010-1458PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Camtek, Ltd. (Camtek) appeals the district court’s final judgment based on a jury verdict that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,826,298 (the '298 patent) are infringed, not invalid, and not unenforceable, and its award of lost profits and grant of a permanent injunction. Camtek also appeals the trial court’s dismissal of its inequitable conduct defense and counterclaim. We affirm the district court’s denials of judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) and a new trial on invalidity. We also affirm the court’s dismissal of Camtek’s inequitable conduct defense and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Pacing Technologies, LLC v. Garmin International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Digital-Vending Services International, LLC v. University of Phoenix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Simo Holdings Inc. v. Hong Kong Ucloudlink NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- C.W. Zumbiel Co. v. KapposCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Tesco Corp. v. Weatherford International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.