Legal Opinion · Dissent

Motorola Credit Corporation v. Standard Chartered Bank

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 2014No. 162Published

1DissentAbdus-Salaam, J.

Today, in the year 2014, the majority for the first time expressly adopts the separate entity rule for postjudgment enforcement proceedings under CPLR article 52. The rule has no statutory basis and was initially formulated by the lower courts nearly a century ago based on a rationale that has no application to these modern times. In choosing this outmoded rule, the majority has engaged in improper judicial legislation, avoided the clear import of our recent decision in Koehler v Bank of Bermuda Ltd. (12 NY3d *164533 [2009]) and given short shrift to the compelling public policy reasons to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands v. Canadian Imperial Bank of CommerceNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Motorola Credit Corp. v. UzanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  3. In re Di BrizziNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Bright Homes, Inc. v. WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API