Quinten v. United States Steel Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gunther J.,
This appeal is by United States Steel Corporation from the refusal of the court below to grant motions for judgment n.o.v. and for a new trial after a directed verdict for plaintiffs in the amount of $4,927.50.
Emanuel Quinten was employed for many years by the defendant corporation. In 1935, the defendant inaugurated a group life insurance plan for its employees and a certificate of insurance was issued to him under the terms of the master policy, in which the insured designated his three children, plaintiffs, as beneficiaries. Contributions toward the premium were…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Poch v. Equit. L. Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Ozanich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Trainer v. LairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Miller v. the Travelers Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Poch v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dawes Mining Co. v. CallahanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Regina S. Kucera v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Soilis Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Jackson v. Pacific Fidelity Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- MM & AM v. RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.