Camfield Tires, Inc. v. Moseley
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Lyle Brown, Justice.
This cause originated as an action for an accounting brought by the appellee, Moseley, against his employer, Camfield Tires, Inc. The critical issue at the trial level was to determine what the written contract of employment meant by “two per cent gross profit”. The trial court determined that the basis of calculation as contended by appellee-employee was correct and awarded judgment for $5064.78.
The contract of employment became effective February 11, 1968. It provided for employment of appellee as a tire salesman at appellant’s place of business in Springdale, Arkansas.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Elkins v. Henry Vogt Machine Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- Morgan v. TurnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Howell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Stacy v. St. Charles Custom Kitchens of Memphis, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Mademoiselle Fashions, Inc. v. Buccaneer Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
- Barton v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.