Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Paloma Frocks, Inc., & Shamokin Sportswear Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 19, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRabin, J.

This appeal requires us to determine whether the president of a close corporation whose stock and directorate control are equally divided may, without consulting or obtaining the approval of the board of directors, institute on his own initiative an arbitration proceeding in the name of the corporation. •

Respondent Shamokin Sportswear Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, inactive for some time, has four directors. The present conflict however is really between its president, George Bernstein, and Harry Toffel, its secretary. The other two directors are their respective nominees. Toffel is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sterling Industries, Inc. v. Ball Bearing Pen Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tidy-House Paper Corp. v. AdlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  2. Hellman v. HellmanNew York Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Schillinger & Albert, Inc. v. Myral Hats, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1967
  4. Hellman v. HellmanNew York Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API