Legal Opinion
Hellman v. Hellman
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 11, 2010Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kenneth R. Fisher, J.
In denying Bruce Heilman’s summary judgment motion, the Appellate Division found:
“The record establishes that, pursuant to the bylaws of ‘Maynard’s Holding Corp.,’ the president, i.e., defendant, was vested with ‘the management of the business of the corporation,’ and he thus had the presumptive authority to enter into contracts on the corporation’s behalf in the course of the business of the corporation.” (Hellman v Hellman, 60 AD3d 1468, 1468 [2009].)
Acknowledging that the record contained evidence that Bruce Heilman signed leases for the corporation…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sterling Industries, Inc. v. Ball Bearing Pen Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Rothman & Schneider, Inc. v. BeckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- West View Hills, Inc. v. Lizau Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Cicero Industrial Development Corp. v. RobertsNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Tidy-House Paper Corp. v. AdlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.