Legal Opinion

Barry v. Beamer

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1908No. Civ. No. 460PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lassen County, and from an order denying a new trial. F. A. Kelley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The object of this action is to secure the specific enforcement of an alleged oral agreement entered into by and between George J. Garey, in his lifetime, and the plaintiff, by which, it is claimed, the first named agreed to will all his property to the plaintiff herein.

The court gave plaintiff judgment. Thereafter, a motion for a new trial was made and the same denied by the court. Prom the order denying said motion this appeal is taken.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff and George J. Garey were brother and sister; that in the month of October, 1900, the plaintiff, who was then about…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Owens v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. McCabe v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Steinmeyer v. SiebertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. Bull v. BrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Henderson v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Velikanje v. DickmanWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Walker v. CallowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Merkle v. MerkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API