Legal Opinion · Concurrence

McDougal v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 18, 1917No. 4353Published

1ConcurrenceDavidson, P. J.

Concurring with Judge MORROW in the reversal of this judgment, I desire to make a few general observations with reference to the introduction of the statements of appellant’s wife. The question presented is this: Was her statement one of fact or one of conclusion or opinion based on some known facts, or formed and reached without facts?. If it was an opinion from either viewpoint, it was clearly inadmissible. If her statement was the result or conclusion of statements made to her by her husband, those statements, if admissible, should be produced and not the conclusion from the statements.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902
  2. Clements v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Lankster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
  4. Tutt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API