Tutt v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
BROOKS, Judge.
In separate counts the indictment charges theft from the person and robbery. The State elected to rely upon the second count and appellant was convicted thereon, and his punishment assessed at ten years confinement in the penitentiary. The only question we deem necessary to review is. the misconduct of the jury. Attached to the motion for new trial is the affidavit of H. E. Seyster who swears that he was a member of the jury that tried appellant. After the jury received the charge of the court and while they were considering their verdict, and before they had agreed, one of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McWilliams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
3Cited by12 opinions
- McDougal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Price v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Horn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Hanks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Scaling v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.