Legal Opinion

Tennelly v. Lancaster

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 19, 1960Published

1Opinion of the Court

BIRD, Judge.

The chancellor decreed that,an incompetent’s committee could, under KRS 389.-010, mortgage the incompetent’s real property for the'purposes of future support and improvements on the property. This appeal is taken from that judgment.

The chancellor, under the record, could and did find that it was necessary for the incompetent to have funds, and the chancellor likewise found as a matter of fact that the interest of the incompetent would be best served by mortgaging the property rather than selling it. This finding of fact is supported by the record and this Court will not disturb…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
  2. Mark v. MarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
  3. Pikeville Oil & Tire Co. v. DeavorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1959
  4. Clay v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API