Legal Opinion

Clay v. Clay

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 5, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMS, Judge.

The question for decision is whether or not the interest in land of contingent infant remaindermen can be mortgaged to satisfy the debts of testator and the cost of administration. There is no dispute in the facts and this appeal presents the sole question of the authority of the circuit court to approve the mortgaging of real estate by the guardian of infant contingent remainder-men to pay the debts of their ancestor where such mortgages would be to the best interest of the infants. The trial judge after hearing proof adjudged it was to the best interest of the infants that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vittitow v. KeeneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  2. B'hymer's Guardian v. B'hymerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Wadlington's Guardian v. Wadlington's GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. Hay's Committee v. Hay's GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Mark v. MarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pikeville Oil & Tire Co. v. DeavorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1959
  2. Tennelly v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API