Legal Opinion

Sprague v. Brook

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 4, 1993No. 92 C 7263PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is defendant’s motion for a protective order staying discovery. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.

FACTS

The plaintiffs in this case are twenty-six federal administrative law judges (“ALJs”) who have filed this lawsuit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief on behalf of themselves and approximately 754 other ALJs. The plaintiffs allege that Douglas A. Brook, as Acting Director of the Office of Personnel Management (the “OPM”), impermissibly adopted certain regulations in connection with a new pay system for ALJs that was established…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Webster v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Builders Ass'n of Greater Chicago v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  2. Brady Corporation v. WoodDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2024
  3. Hardimon v. SCF Lewis and Clark Fleeting LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2022
  4. Liggins v. ReicksDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  5. Robinson v. Walgreen CoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API