Gobbi v. Dileo
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Robert G. Morrow, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Eakin. This is an action upon an injunction bond, upon which defendant Dileo is principal, and defendant, the United States Fidelity & Guarantee Company, is surety, filed in a suit brought by Dileo against this plaintiff Gobbi et al. in the superior court of the State of Washington for the county of Wahkiakum.
Read the full summary
From Multnomah: Robert G. Morrow, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Eakin. This is an action upon an injunction bond, upon which defendant Dileo is principal, and defendant, the United States Fidelity & Guarantee Company, is surety, filed in a suit brought by Dileo against this plaintiff Gobbi et al. in the superior court of the State of Washington for the county of Wahkiakum. The complaint in the suit, which was filed November 13, 1903, alleges facts showing that defendants therein, Gobbi et al., by fraud, acquired the title to certain lands in that county from Dileo, and have cut wood, viz.,…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eakin
1. Plaintiff has filed a motion to affirm the judgment for the reason that no bill of exceptions had been filed within the meaning of the statute and rulings of the court. By order of the court, the original bill of exceptions is certified to this court in lieu of a copy which appears to be only a transcript of the court reporter’s shorthand notes of the trial. It is not in any sense a bill of exceptions as to any errors relied on other than the motion for a directed verdict. See Bigelow v. Columbia Gold Mining Co., 54 Or. 452 (103 Pac. 56, 1007). And this transcript is not certified or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Meyers v. BlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Welsch v. Belleville Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
- Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Co. v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Alexander v. ColcordIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- San Antonio Water Co. v. BodenhamerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moore v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Labagnara v. Kane Furniture Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-Operative Ass'n v. Pennebaker Home for GirlsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Garden City Co. v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929