Legal Opinion

Calzada v. Roberts

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 9, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2024-2477Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OMAR JOSE CALZADA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 24 - 2477 (LLA) JOHN G. ROBERTS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION On May 7, 2025, the court dismissed Plaintiff Omar Jose Calzada’s pro se complaint against the Honorable John G. Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States, and the Honorable Robert J. Conrad, Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. ECF No. 44. Mr. Calzada has since filed four new motions containing seven discrete requests: a motion to alter the court’s judgment and for leave to file an amended…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  2. Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  3. Niedermeier v. Office of BaucusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
  4. New York v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
  5. Lewis v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API