Legal Opinion
King v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 11, 1896No. Indian Depredation, 3533PublishedCited by 2 opinions
On the claimant’s Motion. The Reporters’ statement of the case: The motion of the claimant will be set forth in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Weldon, J.,
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:
On tbe 13tb of April, 1896, tbis case was decided against tbe claimant in tbe following conclusion: “Tbe depredation is not satisfactorily established and comes within tbe case of Stone v. The United States (29 C. Cls. R., 111). Petition dismissed.’7
On tbe 24th of April tbe counsel for claimant filed tbe following motion:
“Now comes tbe claimant in tbe above-entitled cause, by Silas Hare, bis attorney, and moves tbe court for a new trial or rehearing in tbis cause for the following reasons:
“1st. The court erred in dismissing this case on an issue…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Calhoun v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1878
- Stone v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1894
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ater v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Favell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992