St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Carlile
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Sequoyah County; John H. Pitchford, Judge. Action by Thomas Carlile against the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.
Defendant in error, hereinafter called plaintiff, originally filed this action against plaintiff in error, herein after called defendant, in the United States commissioners’ court at Sa-llisaw, Indian Territory, where judgment by default was rendered and entered against defendant, from which judgment defendant prosecuted an - appeal to the United States Court for the Northern District of the Indian Territory, where the same was pending at the time of the admission of the state, and was, by reason.of the provisions of the Enabling Act and Schedule to the Constitution, transferred to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
- Montgomery & West Point Railroad v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. McGivneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. BirdwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
- G. W. Faison & Son v. Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DiggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. BentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Lusk v. Durant Nursery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Clinton Okla. Western R. R. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926