Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Green

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1872PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Kaufman. Tried below before the Hon. John G. Scott. The opinion states the facts on which the rulings are predicated. In the court below, verdict and judgment were rendered for the plaintiffs, Green and his vendee pendente lite, A. T. Wilson.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

On the twenty-fourth day of November, 1857, Ira N. Green and wife sold to Thomas H. Rogers a tract of land situated in Kaufman county, in which was contained 1237acres. The consideration fertile sale of the land was $1845. Green and wife executed to Rogers a bond for title, in which instrument is acknowledged the receipt of $1045, upon the sale and delivery to Green and wife by Rogers, of a negro girl-named Niece, whose price was fixed at that sum.

The title bond further recites that Rogers- executed- and delivered to Green and wife his promissory note-for eight hundred dollars, bearing ten…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dunlap's Adm'r v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Browning v. EstesTexas Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Roeder v. RobsonTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Baker v. RameyTexas Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ball v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Houston Oil Co. v. RandolphTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Gaffney v. MegrathWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Lawler v. YeatmanTexas Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Kaliski v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API