Legal Opinion

McFadin v. City of San Antonio

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 8, 1899PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before Hon. J. L. Camp.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chief Justice.

—Appellant alleged in substance that in January, 1898, he was arrested, and on February 1, 1898, convicted and fined $100 upon the charge of "suspicious character,” the ordinance of the city defining such offense being as follows:

"An Ordinance Defining and Punishing Suspicious Characters: Be it ordained by the council of the city of San Antonio:
“Section 1. All persons who entice any other person or persons to commit any irreputable act or deed; all persons found loitering about the city under suspicious circumstances or places and who are unable to give a proper account…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Galveston v. PosnainskyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Haddock v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Easterly v. Incorporated Town of IrwinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. City of Corsicana v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Harrison v. City of ColumbusTexas Supreme Court · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. ArnoldTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Ellis v. City of West University PlaceTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Elrod v. City of Daytona BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  4. Hershberg v. City of BarbourvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. Simpson v. City of WhatcomWashington Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API