Legal Opinion

Betts v. State ex rel. Jorgensen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1903No. 12,514PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the district court for Cass county. Application for a writ of mandamus to compel the director of a school district to examine and approve the bond of a school-district treasurer. Tried below before Jessen, J. Peremptory writ allowed.

1Opinion of the Court

Lobingier, C.

This was an application for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the respondent, as director of school district No. 94, Cass county, to examine and approve the bond of the relator as treasurer of said district. The alternative writ recited that the relator, “within the time required by law duly executed and presented to the school board of said school district * * * a good and sufficient undertaking as required by laiv in compliance and in conformity with the laws of the state,” and that respondent “refused to examine and approve said undertaking.” The return to the writ,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Bryant v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. People Ex Rel. Geer v. Common Council of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. People Ex Rel. Corwin v. . WalterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Hice v. OrrWashington Supreme Court · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hagerty v. RafnMontana Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Tabor v. HippSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  3. Gill v. RafnMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State Ex Rel. Coulter v. McFarlandNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  5. School District No. 65 v. McQuistonNebraska Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API