Legal Opinion

At & T Corp. v. South Dakota Department of Revenue

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 2002No. NonePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] In this appeal challenging excise and sales tax assessments, we first address the question whether gross receipts from the sale and installation of telephone switching devices are subject to contractor’s excise tax. We hold that even if the devices are not fixtures because they create no improvement to realty, their sale and installation are nonetheless subject to excise tax under the expanded reach of our revised tax laws. Second, in its sales and use tax audit, the Department of Revenue refused to accept certain tax records offered in electronic form. When the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Faircloth v. Raven Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Nash Finch Co. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. In Re the State Sales & Use Tax Liability of Pam Oil, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Brink Electric Construction Co. v. State, Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Puetz Corp. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Department of Revenue & RegulationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Valley Power Sys. v. S.D. Dep't of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API