McKeen v. Boothby
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtPattangall, C. J.
Exceptions. Assumpsit. Money had and received. Verdict directed for defendant.
Defendant, a real estate agent residing in this state, offered for sale certain próperty in Portland, belonging to one Bishop, a resident of Canada, and plaintiff entered into an agreement in writing to purchase the same for $3,500, making a cash payment of $100. The agreement recited that the property was free of incumbrance.
An examination of the records disclosed the fact that in the deed to Bishop, the following restrictions appeared: “No house or other buildings shall be built on said lots within ten years of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Batley v. FoerdererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Bogart v. Crosby & Van HarenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Kirkpatrick v. StainerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
- Whelan v. RossiterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Fowle v. . KerchnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Central Maine Restaurant Supply v. Omni Hotels Management Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1987
- Pelletier v. DwyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- Spickler v. Key Bank of Southern MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Metzler v. IaconeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Ketch v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932